Tuesday, 23 June 2026 | Updating Daily AI insight, written for builders

Qwen3 30B-A3B vs Qwen3 32B: Specs, Pricing & Which to Choose (2026)

Qwen3 30B-A3B vs Qwen3 32B — MoE speed versus dense quality inside the Qwen3 family. Below is the full side-by-side: specifications, API pricing, context window, local hardware requirements, and a clear, data-driven recommendation on which to pick.

SpecQwen3 30B-A3BQwen3 32B
DeveloperAlibabaAlibaba
TypeLLM (MoE)LLM (dense)
Parameters30B total / 3B active (MoE)32B
Context window128K128K
ModalityText → TextText → Text
LicenseApache 2.0 (open)Apache 2.0 (open)
Open weights✅ Yes✅ Yes
Input price ($/1M)$0.12$0.08
Output price ($/1M)$0.5$0.28
VRAM (4-bit)~18 GB~20 GB
Min GPU (local)RTX 4090 24GB (Q4) — fast, 3B activeRTX 4090 24GB (Q4)
Released20252025

Key differences

  • Cost: Qwen3 32B is 65% cheaper than Qwen3 30B-A3B on a blended-token basis.
  • Openness: both are open-weight, so either can be self-hosted or fine-tuned. Compare their VRAM needs above to see what your GPU can run.
  • Run Qwen3 30B-A3B locally: ~~18 GB at 4-bit (min RTX 4090 24GB (Q4) — fast, 3B active).
  • Run Qwen3 32B locally: ~~20 GB at 4-bit (min RTX 4090 24GB (Q4)).

Which should you choose?

Choose Qwen3 30B-A3B if it fits your existing stack or you prefer Alibaba.

Choose Qwen3 32B if you want the lower per-token cost for high-volume workloads.

→ Estimate real costs in the API cost calculator · check local hardware in the VRAM calculator · browse all 30+ models.

All specs and prices are pulled live from our AI models database and kept current. Compare either model against others, or estimate your own monthly spend with the free calculators above.

Scroll to Top