Tuesday, 10 November 2026 | Updating Daily AI insight, written for builders

Muse Spark 1.3

Muse Spark 1.3 — Specifications

Zusammengestellt von Mustafa Ihsan aus der Dokumentation des Herstellers · Zuletzt aktualisiert

Entwickler Meta
Typ Schlussfolgern / agentenbasiert
Modality Text, image, video, audio, PDF → Text
Parameter Nicht offengelegt
Kontextfenster 1 Mio.
Lizenz Proprietär
Offene Gewichte Nein
Veröffentlicht 2026-09
Eingabepreis $1.25 /1M
Ausgabepreis $4.25 /1M
API-Anbieter Meta Model API (also in Muse Code)

Offizielle Seite →

What is Muse Spark 1.3?

Muse Spark 1.3 is Meta’s model for agentic and coding work at scale, released on 2 September 2026 on Meta Model API and in Muse Code. Metas Ankündigung says it sustains long, multi-step work better than earlier Muse Spark models, and that in comparisons by Meta engineers it used about 20% fewer tool calls and 25% fewer tokens than Muse Spark 1.2. It accepts text, images, video, audio and PDF, returns text, has a 1,048,576-token context window and supports reasoning effort from minimal to max (default high). Meta’s docs recommend it for new work but warn that audio understanding on 1.3 is not fully supported; use Muse Spark 1.2 for audio.

In Standard mode it costs $1.25 per million input tokens, $0.15 for cached input and $4.25 per million output tokens, with no long-context premium. Contributor mode (muse-spark-1.3-contributor) drops that to $0.10, $0.002 and $0.20, but Meta may then use your prompts, code, files and the model’s responses to train future Meta models, and the max reasoning level is not available. Web search grounding adds $2.50 per 1,000 queries (see Meta’s pricing page).

Muse Spark sits in the middle of Meta’s lineup: Muse Wonder ($4 / $20, in preview) is Meta’s most capable model, and Muse Ember ($0.10 / $0.50 for requests up to 200K input tokens) handles high-volume sub-tasks. Muse Spark Open is a separate open-weight release (816B total, 42B active parameters); Muse Spark 1.3 itself is a hosted model without public weights. Meta’s Model API lists no Llama models, so for open Llama weights see Llama 4 Maverick, and compare monthly costs with the KI-API-Kostenrechner.

Muse Spark 1.3 pricing: API cost per 1M tokens

Eingabe (pro 1 Mio. Token)$1.25
Ausgabe (pro 1 Mio. Token)$4.25
Verhältnis Output/Input3.4×
Gemischt (4:1 Input:Output)$1.85 pro 1 Mio. Tokens

What Muse Spark 1.3 costs per month

Tatsächliche monatliche Ausgaben bei einem 4:1-Input-zu-Output-Mix – dem Verhältnis, das typische Chat- oder RAG-Arbeitslasten tatsächlich erzeugen.

WorkloadTokens/MonatKosten pro Monat
Nebenprojekt 1 Mio. Eingabe / 0,25 Mio. Ausgabe $2.31
Kleines Team 20 Mio. Eingabe / 5 Mio. Ausgabe $46
Produktion 200 Mio. Eingabe / 50 Mio. Ausgabe $463

Stellen Sie Ihre eigenen Berechnungen im KI-API-Kostenrechner.

Cheaper alternatives to Muse Spark 1.3

ModellGewichteter Preis pro Million US-DollarSie sparen
Llama 3.1 8B offenere $0.0240 99 % günstiger
Mistral NeMo 12B offenere $0.0292 98% cheaper
Gemma 3 4B offenere $0.0600 97% günstiger

Häufig gestellte Fragen

How much does Muse Spark 1.3 cost per 1M tokens?

Muse Spark 1.3 costs $1.25 per 1M input tokens and $4.25 per 1M output tokens. At a typical 4:1 input-to-output mix that blends to about $1.85 per 1M tokens.

How much does Muse Spark 1.3 cost per month?

A small-team workload of 20M input and 5M output tokens a month costs about $46 on Muse Spark 1.3. A side project (1M in / 0.25M out) costs roughly $2.31.

What is a cheaper alternative to Muse Spark 1.3?

Llama 3.1 8B is the strongest cheaper option in our database at $0.0240 per 1M blended — about 99% less than Muse Spark 1.3. It is also open-weight, so self-hosting is an option.

Can I run Muse Spark 1.3 locally?

No. Muse Spark 1.3 is a closed, API-only model — the weights are not released, so it cannot be self-hosted.

Why does Muse Spark 1.3 charge more for output than input?

Output tokens are generated one at a time and cannot be batched the way a prompt can, so they cost the provider more to serve. Muse Spark 1.3 charges 3.4× more for output, which is why prompt-heavy workloads are far cheaper to run than generation-heavy ones.

Die Preise entsprechen den offiziell veröffentlichten Listenpreisen für die primäre API des jeweiligen Modells und werden regelmäßig aktualisiert, sobald Anbieter diese ändern. Volumen-, Batch- und Cached-Input-Rabatte sind nicht enthalten. Vergleichen Sie alle Modelle nebeneinander im Datenbank für KI-Modelle oder das LLM-Leaderboard.

Scroll to Top